Home
Current Issue
About Us
Submissions
Members
Archive
Forthcoming
Contact Us
Search

Responses and Reactions to "Minorities, Shareholder and Otherwise" by Anupam Chander: Comparing Corporate and Constitutional Minority Protections Print E-mail

ImageIn a 2003 essay in The Yale Law Journal entitled Minorities, Shareholder and Otherwise, Anupam Chander compared corporate law’s special protections for minority shareholders with the increasingly colorblind position of constitutional law, arguing that the former has much to teach the latter.  In this edition of The Yale Law Journal Pocket Part we revisit this controversial essay with reactions from three constitutional and corporate law scholars and, finally, a response from Anupam Chander addressing these perspectives on his work.


 
Most Recent
Nancy Kim, Imposing Tort Liability on Websites for Cyber- Harassment
Arina V. Popova, We Don’t Want To Conquer You; We Have Enough To Worry About: The Russian Sovereign Wealth Fund
Paul Rose, Sovereign Wealth Funds: Active or Passive Investors?
The Pocket Part, Sovereign Wealth Funds Symposium
Mihir A. Desai & Dhammika Dharmapala, Taxing the Bandit Kings
Victor Fleischer, Should We Tax Sovereign Wealth Funds?
Mark E. Plotkin, Foreign Direct Investment by Sovereign Wealth Funds
The Pocket Part, Responses and Reactions to "Minorities, Shareholder and Otherwise" by Anupam Chander: Comparing Corporate and Constitutional Minority Protections
Anupam Chander, Response: Corporate Law’s Distributive Design
Kevin R. Johnson, Minorities, Immigrant and Otherwise
Most Popular
Brian Leiter, Why Blogs Are Bad for Legal Scholarship
Andrew P. Thomas, The CSI Effect: Fact or Fiction
Lee H. Rosenthal, An Overview of the E-Discovery Rules Amendments
Jack M. Balkin, Online Legal Scholarship: The Medium and the Message
The Pocket Part, The Future of Legal Scholarship
Newsletter Signup
Sign up here to receive our monthly mailings:
TPP Newsletter
YLJ eTOC



Syndicate
Search

© 2008 The Yale Law Journal Company. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement