Search results for: "710" (348 results)
Dep’t of Med. Assistance v. Bowen, 846 F.2d 708, 710 (11th Cir. 1988); Torres, Interim Decision 3010 (B.I.A. 1986); Herrera, 18 I. & N. Dec. 4 (B.I.A
antitrust fixes); Lina M. Khan, Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox, 126 YALE L.J. 710, 803 (2017) (arguing that taking on high-tech dominance calls for
Parenthood v. Reynolds ex rel. State, 975 N.W.2d 710 (Iowa 2022). 79. CTR. FOR REPROD. RTS., supra note 64, at 11. 80. MICH. CONST. art. I, § 28, cl
denied, 137 S. Ct. 612, 613 (2017). 45. Fish v. Kobach, 840 F.3d 710 (10th Cir. 2016) (affirming preliminary injunction); Fish v. Ko- bach, 309 F
State Department of Environmental Conservation, 710 N.Y.S.2d 521 (Sup. Ct. 2000), which addresses state implementation of the federal CAA; and Bowers
circumstances to justify modification of a consent decree). See Emkes, 710 F.3d at 398, 413 (“Consent decrees are not entitlements. Instead, a decree may
911 Emergency After Crawford v. Washington, 46 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 707, 710 (2006) (“The U.S[.] Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the proposition
market for litigation financing. 106. See supra note 89 and accompanying text. 107. See Barksdale, supra note 7, at 710. 108. See supra Sections
Doctrine, 85 Wash. U. L. Rev. 681, 710 (2007) (finding that only 3% of all district court orders appear on Westlaw). I chose this two-year period because
note 10, at 2557-58 n.54; see also Super, supra note 73, at 710-11. Super’s point is well-taken, but adding strings to federal money can create its own