Search results for: "n" (3655 results)
Jurisprudence of Economic Rights, 73 N.C. L. Rev. 329, 426-27 (1995). 367. See Eyer, supra note 354, at 1366 & n.231 (citing Thomas B. Nachbar, Rational Basis
Tamika Riley of the Land Fraud Counts . . . .”). 79. Id. at 339. 80. Press Release, U.S. Att’y’s Off., N. Dist. of N.Y., Former New York State
Filene’s Basement, Inc., No. 06 Civ. 244RMBMHD, 2009 WL 855955, at *10 n.3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2009) (suggesting the Zubulake factors as an appropriate test
“[I]n any view, consent obtained through fraud . . . is no defense.”). 15. NLRB v. Dadourian Exp. Corp., 138 F.2d 891, 892 (2d Cir. 1943
State, 744 A.2d 864, 880 n.13 (Vt. 1999) (“The test to evaluate whether a facially gender-neutral statute discriminates on the basis of sex is whether
3 n.1. 87. HIGGINS, supra note 85, at 91; see also JANIS, supra note 24, at 52 (“[T]he object of Grotius’ exercise of natural law was to find
Reconsidered: “People Do Not Seem To Be Predictable Characters,” 49 HASTINGS L.J. 871, 881-82 n.38 (1998) (noting that attributional error can
advise as required by [Rule] 44(c) does not make necessary a reversal.”). 77. See, e.g., Riggs v. United States, 209 F.3d 828, 831 n.1 (6th Cir. 2000
understood to be a virtue and not a defect. It is the limited nature of the proposals—and, attendantly, the fact that they carry no new financial burden and
infra notes 598-605 and accompanying text; cf. Torres, supra note 180, at 229-30 n.3 (lamenting that in conflicts with tribes over natural resources