Search results for: "n" (3655 results)
statutes were enacted during the Jim Crow era for the purpose of promot- ing racial segregation. See, e.g., Evans v. Newton, 382 U.S. 296, 300 n.3
Lukumi Babalu Aye, 508 U.S. at 543; see also Lund, supra note 158, at 640-41 & n.58. 164. See supra notes 124-128 and accompanying text
Appellate Y N Y N Y Writ of Appeal D NY Semi-public Foreigner (Spanish) N N Y The Nereide 13 U.S. 388 1815 Y Y Y N Y Appellate N N Y N Y Writ of Appeal D
substantive law” and thus be constitutionally permissible. Healy, supra note 7, at 1198 n.138. But he does not elaborate on whether Congress has
739. 189. Id. at 740 n.7. the new standing doctrine 1039 tion is therefore necessary but not sufficient for a valid excuse, and jurisdiction- al
a public 22. See KOLKER & HARRINGTON, supra note 19, at 3 n.24. 23. See Public Charge Fact Sheet, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGR. SERVS. (Sept. 22
N Y N Y Laws+ Guidance N/A- No Claus e 2 Y N Translate Bio, Inc. Y Y Y Y-SameRegion N Y N Y Laws+ Guidance Y Y N Trillium Ther. Inc. N (non
that do not fall within their scope.” Brilmayer & Listwa, supra note 9, at 287 n.70. That is simply wrong. The illustration the yale law journal
supra note 32, at 2102 & n.232 (noting normative questions underlying probabilistic methodology). 89. Cf. Goldberg, supra note 53, at 824, 831-32. 90
”); Cloud, supra note 62, at 859 (describing the ratchet effect). See generally Crespo, supra note 32, at 2102 & n.232 (noting normative questions