Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
constitutional liberty of the individual.”). 45. Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290 (2000); Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992); Sch. Dist
Li Feldman, Prudence, Benevolence, and Negligence: Virtue Ethics and Tort Law, 74 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1431 (2000), and general justifications of legal
529 U.S. 120, 159-61 (2000) (interpreting the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act narrowly so as not to permit the regulation of cigarettes); Indus
Law and Economics, in 1 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LAW AND ECONOMICS 790 (Boudewijn Bouckaert & Gerrit De Geest eds., 2000). SWEETFINAL 9/24/2003 1:48 PM 220
Northwest Bronx Cmty. Clergy Coal. Hous. Comm. 6 (July 10, 2000), https://ibo.nyc.ny.us/iboreports/hpd.pdf https://perma.cc/72E2-9G4L. This is
Peruta v. California, 137 S. Ct. 1995, 1999-2000 (2017) (Thomas, J., dissenting), cert. denied sub nom., Peruta v. Cnty. of San Diego, 824 F.3d 919 (9th
Political Safeguards of Federalism, 100 Colum. L. Rev. 215 (2000);Judith Resnik, Categorical Federalism: Jurisdiction, Gender and the Globe, 111 Yale L.J
Stephen Breyer, Changing Relationships Among European Constitutional Courts, 21 Cardozo L. Rev. 1045, 1045 (2000). Stephen Breyer, Assoc. Justice, U.S
1297, 1297, 1300-01 (2000) (describing the conventional view that Congress, through establishment of the first Solicitor General, hoped to enforce
294-95 (Eric Higgs, Andrew Light & David Strong eds., 2000) (pro- moting a continued recognition of technical phenomena but a departure from