Search results for: "2" (3504 results)
1 All times are ET unless otherwise noted. 2 ● Justified: The Note’s argument should be analytically sound. Each step in the argument
%20on%20PSG.pdf. 2 See Matter of C-A-, 3 I. & N. Dec. 951 (BIA 2006) (particular social group must be “visible”) and Matter of S-E- G-, 24 I. & N. Dec
Redacted%20DHS%20brief%20on%20PSG.pdf. 2 See Matter of C-A-, 3 I. & N. Dec. 951 (BIA 2006) (particular social group must be “visible”) and Matter of S-E- G
U.S.C.). 2. 18 U.S.C. § 4001(a) (2000); see also Act of Sept. 25, 1971, Pub. L. No. 92-128, 85 Stat. 347 (codifying the present incarnation of § 4001
available at http://cgrs.uchastings.edu/pdfs/Redacted%20DHS%20brief%20on%20PSG.pdf. 2 See Matter of C-A-, 3 I. & N. Dec. 951 (BIA 2006) (particular
5. 77 CAL. L. REV. 235 (1989). POLLAK V122021 (POST OP POST FORMATTING FIXES, POST FLIP) 2/6/2006 5:55:40 PM the yale law journal 115:745 2006
KAPLOW.WEB.DOC 1/5/2012 2:47:23 PM 738 Louis Kaplow Burden of Proof abstract. The burden of proof is a central feature of all
& Vandenbergh, supra note 3, at 78-79, 92-93; Heinzerling, supra note 2, at 326, 361-64; Steinzor, supra note 2, at 251, 264, 272-73. As I will argue
§ 16750(a) (West 2008); D.C. Code § 28-4509(a) (2011); 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 10/7(2) (West 2010); Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.778 (2009); Minn. Stat. § 325D
Id. 75. 2 U.S.C. § 285b(1) (2018). 76. See infra Section II.C. the yale law journal 134:2122 2025 2138 Second, the process by which codified text is