Search results for: "2" (3504 results)
Contributions: Tax Deductions or Matching Grants, 28 TAX L. REV. 37 (1972). SIMON V122021 (POST OP, POST FLIP) 2/6/2006 5:54:51 PM the yale law journal 115:751
1305, 93rd Cong., 2d Sess. (1974). 21. U.S. CONST. art. I, § 5, cl. 2. 22. See CHAFETZ, supra note 8, at 210 (noting that there are no
Confederation foresaw.”). U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 2; see also Principality of Monaco v. Mississippi, 292 U.S. 313, 328-29 (1934) (“The States by the
78. Id. at 2489 (quoting Util. Air Regulatory Grp., 134 S. Ct. at 2444). the yale law journal forum August 2, 2017 192 agency has interpretive
Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents, 26 AIPLA Q.J. 185, 241 (1998)). 51. See Ouellette, supra note 2, at 368-69. 52. Patent Inflation
Identity Politics, 87 FORDHAM L. REV. 1515, 1519 (2019). the yale law journal forum November 2, 2022 358 myriad ways.29 Fortifying American democracy
267, 267 & nn. 2-3, 269-70 (1995); Amy Rothschild, Is America Holding Out on Protecting Children’s Rights?, ATLANTIC (May 2, 2017), http
Edelman and Pennhurst II). 224. See Atascadero, 473 U.S. at 243 n.3. 225. Justice Lewis F. Powell, Conference Notes 1-2, Atascadero State Hosp. v
Path to Private Property: Agricultural Land Law in Russia, 16 COLUM. J. EUR. L. 261, 275 (2010). 201. See Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003, (ASP 2), pt. 2. 202. See Trinidad, supra ...