Search results for: "n" (3655 results)
Richard D. Friedman, Route Analysis of Credibility and Hearsay, 96 YALE L.J. 667, 673-74 n.17 (1987) (noting that “non-human witnesses” could include
invocation of this argument has not, however, been uniform. See, e.g., Government’s Reply Brief at 22 n.12, United States v. Horton, No. 16-3976, 2017
accompanying notes 207-208. 279. See, e.g., Marta v. Sullivan, 248 A.2d 608, 610 & n.3 (Del. 1968) (invalidating a local ordi- nance “purport[ing] to
; Shultz v. Alabama, 330 F. Supp. 3d 1344, 1365 n.23 (N.D. Ala. 2018), appeal pending sub nom. Hester v. Gentry, No. 18-13898 (11th Cir. Sept. 13, 2018
for Comments; Correction 00-1461 65 Fed. Reg. 3,425 6 n This document only notes purely typographical cor- rections to an earlier (nonresponsive
N. Hurd, who was appointed by President Clinton); Thoms v. Maricopa Cnty. Cmty. Coll. Dist., No. CV-21-01781-PHX-SPL, 2021 WL 5162538 (D. Ariz. Nov
Hague Convention); Knight v. Ford Motor Co., 615 A.2d 297, 301 n.11 (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div. 1992) (same). 14. The plaintiffs claimed that the
number of im- portant writers and without doubt has substantially influenced thought on the subject”); JAFFE, supra note 64, at 546-47 & n.4 (noting that