Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
decide that a Title IX gender-identity claim was likely to succeed), and Schwenk v. Hartford, 204 F.3d 1187, 1201-02 (9th Cir. 2000) (stat- ing, in
See Managed Medicaid: Arizona’s AHCCCS Experience, NAT’L HEALTH POL’Y F. 1 (2000), https:// www.nhpf.org/library/site-visits/SV_AZ00.pdf [https
318 (2000)). The America Invents Act replaced inter partes reexamination with inter partes and post-grant review, see Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
and Doctrine in First Amendment Jurisprudence, 88 CALIF. L. REV. 2353, 2362 (2000) (stating that “[t]he democratic theory of the First Amend- ment
who have rejected the retroactive application of the modern sentencing revolution, initiated in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), have said
his] case by a probability greater than 0.5 or greater than 50%.” (quoting DAN B. DOBBS, THE LAW OF TORTS 360 (2000))) (alterations in original). 2
History in the New Law and Economics of Property, 79 Or. L. Rev. 479, 488 (2000) (noting that “our emotional responses to property derive from our
; Mark Tushnet, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (2000); Adrian Vermeule, Judging Under Uncertainty: An Institutional Theory of Legal
Democracy (2000) (addressing similar themes with a particular focus on the post-WWII Cold War period). Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, 516 (1951
make an unwelcome takeover more IV, Empirical Evidence on Structural Takeover Defenses: Where Do We Stand?, 54 U. MIAMI L. REV. 783 (2000); Frank H