Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
Diffusion of Racial Restric- tive Covenants, 115 POL. SCI. Q. 541, 544 (2000). 95. “The issue involved in the instant case is a simple one, i.e., shall the
part of it. See United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 227 (2000) (“[A]gencies charged with applying a statute necessarily make all sorts of
IN AMERICA 162- 65 (2006); see also GLENN H. UTTER, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF GUN CONTROL AND GUN RIGHTS 201 (2000). 30. See infra Section III.B. 31. See
AM. LAW INST. 2000). 22. See Alex Stein, Toward a Theory of Medical Malpractice, 97 IOWA L. REV. 1201, 1207-08 (2012); see also Eleanor D. Kinney
” Requirement (and Other Unruly Patent Disclosure Doctrines), 2 WASH. U. J.L. & POL’Y 55, 62-69 (2000) (describing the Federal Circuit’s struggles with
Uses and Limits of Law: Printz and Principle?, 111 HARV. L. REV. 2180 (1998); Larry D. Kramer, The Supreme Court 2000 Term—Foreword: We the Court, 115
Electronic Music, Always Current, N.Y. TIMES (July 9, 2000), https://www.nytimes.com/2000/07/09/arts/music-electronic-music-always-current.html [https
Part II. 21. See HENDRIK HARTOG, MAN AND WIFE IN AMERICA: A HISTORY 101 (2000) (“Being a house- holder, being someone who cared for and controlled a
Comment, The Pro Se Criminal Defendant, Standby Counsel, and the Judge: A Proposal for Better-Defined Roles, 71 U. COLO. L. REV. 789, 815 (2000
51,716 (Aug. 24, 2000) (codified at 17 C.F.R. pts. 240, 243 & 249). The rule changes the law under Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983), which had