Search results for: "100" (2101 results)
States v. Peoni, 100 F.2d 401, 402 (2d Cir. 1938), . . . explaining that ‘the government must prove that the defendant . . . “participated in the criminal
N.Y. Times Co. v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice (N.Y. Times I), 756 F.3d 100 (2d Cir. 2014), amended on denial of reh’g by 758 F.3d 436 (2d Cir. 2014
; Cass R. Sunstein, Beyond the Republican Revival, 97 Yale L.J. 1539 (1988); Frank I. Michelman, Foreword: Traces of Self-Government, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 4
Between Conservative Corporate Law Theory and Citizens United, 100 Cornell L. Rev. 335, 379-87 (2015) (arguing that corporations’ increasing financial
this case in the text accompanying notes 93-100, infra. In later work, Turner discussed a hypothetical based on United States v. United Shoe Machinery
default rule deferring to state courts on all domestic relations issues.”100 By suggesting that the exception could apply even in cases alleging
should never be enforceable. Any liquidated damage award for obstruction—be it $1,000, $100, or $10—is a pure penalty. This may even be the case in
1974) (Marshall, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Wolf, supra note 27, at 1623; Haas, supra note 24, at 815-17 & nn.93- 100. 29
commercial exception.100 Nonetheless, the nature/purpose distinc- tion does not map onto the relevant underlying distinction between a state’s ac- tions in
26 (1960). 6. See, e.g., Owen M. Fiss, Why the State?, 100 HARV. L. REV. 781, 788 (1987); see also Owen M. Fiss, Free Speech and Social Structure