Search results for: "2" (3517 results)
2 FARRAND, RECORDS, supra note 166, at 447 (Madison). 227. Id. at 448. 228. Id. 229. See, e.g., Jackson, supra note 24, at 21 (“In 1927 a
SCALE AND SCOPE, supra note 237, at 62-63. 239. See LAMOREAUX, supra note 237. 240. Id. at 2. 241. See PHILIP SCRANTON, ENDLESS NOVELTY
approach, see id. at 214-22, 234-35. 211. See Tarbert, supra note 159, at 6. 212. Id. at 7. 213. See, e.g., 2 Phillip C. Jessup, Elihu Root 233-34
§ 240.14e-1 (2003). 53. See id. § 240.14d-8. 54. See id. § 240.14d-10. 55. See, e.g., CONN. GEN. STAT. § 33-842(b)(1)-(2) (2003) (requiring an acquirer to
Reckoning with Unconscious Rac… See Issacharoff, Discrimination Model, supra note 2, at 121-22. Spencer Overton argues that increa… For the classic argument
268A, § 2 (West 2024); N.C. GEN STAT. § 14-217 (2024); N.D. CENT. CODE ANN. § 12.1-12.01 (2023); D.C. CODE § 22-712 (2024). 131. Guam’s statute
would probably not violate the non-attainder principle.” Akhil Reed Amar, Attainder and Amendment 2: Romer’s Rightness, 95 Mich. L. Rev. 203, 213
Against Groundwater Cutbacks in California, & W. (Mar. 2, 2023), https://andthewest.stanford.edu/2022/a-simmering-revolt-against-groundwater-cutbacks-in
International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings art. 2, Dec. 15, 1997, 2149 U.N.T.S. 284 (entered into force May 23, 2001
Rev. 1 (2019) (defining and cataloguing prohibitions against psychological torture). AFM 2-22.3, supra note 21, paras. M-2, M-29 to -30; see also U.S