Search results for: "IF" (3853 results)
apocalypse if the Court strikes down section 5. They believe that state actors, especially in jurisdictions currently covered by section 5, will once again
law enforcement if the plaintiffs were to prevail. I. The Statutory Argument A. The Syllogism Here is the legal syllogism, as spelled out in the
litigation to prove that it is “absolutely clear” they will not restart their conduct if the case is dismissed as moot. The Supreme Court has
if the plaintiffs were to prevail. i . the statutory argument A. The Syllogism Here is the legal syllogism, as spelled out in the complaint. The
will be, as if the story were winding down, when really it has just begun. . . . My highest aspiration for my work on the Court is to grow in
roles within relationships, women face an uphill battle if they wish to use firearms to combat domestic violence. Courts are less likely to deem
they do not suffer reputational loss.5 If other hackers become aware of the site’s vulnerability, a nonmalicious hack may be the precursor to more
surrounding the legal process and the actors involved have culminated in one simple question: What if a third party had in fact controlled the
family or friends. SCR listing is therefore a mechanism for ongoing punishment, surveillance, and control, even if no court action is ever initiated
enforcement is most often viewed as a deterrent to undesirable or harmful behavior. If a punishment is rarely inflicted, the deterrent may lose its