Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
Fertility and Feminism: Landmarks in Women’s Rights, Guardian (July 27, 2017 2:00 AM), https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/jul/27
Supp. 3d 606 (E.D. Pa. 2020). 22. Id. at 616 (emphasis added). 23. Id. at 609 nn.1-2. 24. See Jensen v. Television Sys. Corp., 372 F. Supp. 3d 95
Vanessa A. Countryman, Sec’y, Sec. & Exch. Comm’n 2 (Oct. 1, 2021), https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-10-21/s71021-9316498- 260092.pdf [https
2015); see also infra note 18. 2. See, e.g., Bus. Roundtable v. SEC (BRT), 647 F.3d 1144 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Am. Equity Inv. Life Ins. Co. v. SEC, 613
of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 254(a) (2012). 31. Steiner v. Mitchell, 350 U.S. 247, 252-53 n.2 (1956). 32. See id. at 256. 33. See Integrity Staffing Sols
agreements cannot be reached. II. Not Reasonably Accessible Information and Allocating Discovery Costs Rule 26(b)(2) is amended to address another key
294. See generally Liz Ford, Families, Fertility and Feminism: Landmarks in Women’s Rights, GUARDIAN (July 27, 2017 2:00 AM), https
U.S.C. § 30121(1)(a) (2018). 206. BLACK & BOBBITT, supra note 18, at 32. 207. 2 JONATHAN ELLIOT, THE DEBATES IN THE SEVERAL STATE CONVENTIONS ON THE
; and he is responsible for every nomination he makes.” 2 ELLIOT, supra note 207, at 480. the yale law journal forum November 26, 2018 568 F
invalidating Harvard’s and the University of North Carolina’s admissions programs. SFFA, 600U.S. at 198 n.2 (citing Gratz v. Bollinger, 539U.S. 244, 276 n.23