Search

Search results for: "2" (3515 results)

130.Hovenkamp_mawopj7e

Anticompetitive Defaults 2011 c. Line-of-Business Restrictions 2013 d. The Comparative Advantage of Tailored Injunctions 2016 e. Administrability 2018 2

132.1_AwreyMacey_k4mi2s7o

STRATEGY 2 (June 10, 2010). 299. See James B. Stewart & Peter Eavis, Revisiting the Lehman Brothers Bailout that Never Was, N.Y. TIMES (Sept. 29

The Right To Be Rescued: Disability Justice in an Age of Disaster | Yale Law Journal

Nov. 2, 2012, http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/power-returns-parts-manhattan-article-1.1195804 http://perma.cc/S8GY-2HEU (headline and lead

Microsoft Word - e.2940.Kessler.2993.docx

supra note 35, at 235 & n.2, 242. 250. Id. at 242. 251. Id. at 18. 252. Id. at 219, 223-25. 253. YVES DEZALAY & BRYANT G. GARTH, DEALING IN

Microsoft Word - 1732.Bayefsky.1782

Glaister, Introduction to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS 1, 2 (Richard Layard & Stephen Glaister eds., 2d ed. 1994). 28. Hahn & Sunstein, supra note 9, at 7. 29

Microsoft Word - b.1012.Ablavsky.1090.docx

Apr. 18, 1783, ch. 2, 1783 N.C. Sess. Laws 322, 322-25. 230. Ablavsky, supra note 24, at 1018-33. 231. Id. 232. See James Duane’s Views on Indian

F8.HamiltonFinalDraftforWeb_2p4pqanb

THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM N O V E M B E R 1 5 , 2 0 2 3 abstract. introduction 1 2 3 1 2 3 the yale law journal

Reducing Inequality on the Cheap: When Legal Rule Design Should Incorporate Equity as Well as Efficiency

Stud. 797, 805-06 (2000) hereinafter Sanchirico, Taxes Versus Legal Rules critiques Kaplow & Shavell, supra note 2, noting that it can be efficient

Microsoft Word - 17. Melamed & Shapiro ME Proof 1_Clean.docx

found valid and infringed. 44. 15 U.S.C. § 2 (2012). 45. Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297, 303 (3d Cir. 2007) (holding that the

F7.YoungerFinalDraftWEB_pkbknk8f

BRANCH [5, 13], https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/26/Approved%20ABS%20summaries.pdf [https:// perma.cc/9MNB-4CKR]. 25. Id. at [1]. 26. Id. at [2]. As