Search results for: "A" (4257 results)
as a right to security against state action); David Alan Sklansky, Too Much Information: How Not To Think About Privacy and the Fourth Amendment, 102
constitutional interpretation. There is, after all, an explicit right to a trial and not to a plea. See U.S. Const. amend. VI. For another, while there is
legislatures, as institutions, have promise as a bulwark against local regulation that appears inefficient or abusive. Landowners will not always win
whether a rule is arbitrary and capricious, courts are obliged to consider an agency’s reasoning only at the time the agency made its decision. See SEC v
Now these corporations must secure the “(1) recommend[ation of] a disinterested and independent special committee, and (2) approv[al] by stockholders
as an alternative to the principal/agent analysis to argue that corporate actors voluntarily submit themselves to a corporate hierarchy out of self
attrac- tive as an actual policy, then the argument of this Essay is perhaps a partial re- ductio ad absurdum of a system of exclusive public prosecution
approximately $130,962 per year, assuming an agent of average experience. Agents are required, “to average a 50-hour work week over the course of the
of privacy federalism is a sharing of enforcement authority among federal and state regulators. As a final aspect of its consideration of an
or acts;”39 and “a person’s tendency to act in a certain way in all varying situations of life,”40 among others. At best, these definitions are too