Search results for: "100" (1842 results)
restrictions on 51. See Anderson v. Griswold, 543 P.3d 283, 342 (Colo. 2023), rev’d sub nom. Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024) (“[B]ecause
discrimina- tion prohibited under Title VII. See, e.g., Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc., 883 F.3d 100 (2d Cir. 2018) (en banc); Hively v. Ivy Tech Cmty
370 (Harlan, J., concurring))). the yale law journal 121:738 2012 744 deriving from there being no other focal points—besides 0% and 100
orientation discrimination). For decisions that have recently gone the other way, see Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc., 883 F.3d 100 (2d Cir. 2018) (en banc
Consider the following example: Taxpayer A, a non-REIT corporation, is the debtor on a $100 loan from an unrelated lender. Interest accrues on the debt at
Love Risk, 100 COLUM. L. REV. 1096, 1121 (2000). The presence of an insurable interest makes such contracts differ only in this respect: insurance
Individual Sector Proposal. Some of the themes of this proposal are also explored in Charles A. Reich, The Individual Sector, 100 Yale L.J. 1409 (1991
The Trouble with Amicus Facts, 100 VA. L. REV. 1757, 1778 (2014). 28. Ryan J. Owens & Lee Epstein, Amici Curiae During the Rehnquist Years, 89
Employment and Housing Discrimination Litigation, 100 KY. L.J. (forthcoming 2012), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1941294; Patricia Hatamyar