Search results for: "IF" (3032 results)
student survivors face, arguing that if one hopes to guarantee gender equity in education, Title IX must be understood to allow for recovery of costs
driven by two primary objectives: first, to convey to the public more influence over police, and second, to establish a robust if not radical
Those difficulties are exacerbated if the Court’s decisions are not based on the Justices’ own, legally informed assessment of the relevant changes but
might seem to duplicate the formalist argument already made. If Hively were a man dating a woman, she would conform with gender stereotypes. But since
sections 10 and 11 are “exclusive”13 raises a separate question that the Court did not squarely address but that now begs to be answered: If the FAA
Governmental Experts (GGE), progress is agonizingly slow.5 They are on the horns of a dilemma. On the one hand, if states build “normative firewalls
“Life looks really shitty from behind bars . . . . And, if you guys do anything that’s illegal, I don’t mind having you in prison.” —General Mark
oppose if he understood the truth. It seems natural, in the first case, to say that the truthful doctor respects her patient and supports his effort
that basis only if a jury determined that bodily harm had resulted. Id. at 235; see also Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998
legal controversies are concerned, by the Supreme Court. However, as Fred Schauer noted in his own presentation, if one likes the notion of “diversity