Search results for: "9" (3091 results)
Power Co., 582 F.3d 309, 310 (2d Cir. 2009). 8. Id. at 393-94. 9. Id. at 371 (quoting Milwaukee II, 451 U.S. 304, 314 (1981)). The Second Circuit also
do so for any reason whatsoever.9 Scholars, considering this imbalance of power unfair, have called for explicit property rights for virtual world
own behalf.”9 Examples of imputed income fall into one of two categories: wealth from self-provided services (such as growing one’s own food) and
States.9 In Kramer, the decedent had an employment contract that entitled him to receive a fixed weekly amount during his lifetime. Upon his death
the kind of “general requirement,” related to “products in addition to devices,” that the FDA’s regulation saved from preemption.9 The FDA’s brief
more important than the converse right recognized in Hill v. Lockhart.9 While Justice Scalia argues that a defendant cannot be prejudiced by going
the fox to guard the henhouse.9 Skepticism is especially warranted because OPR discloses few details of its work. Although OPR issues annual reports
implication so strong as to exclude any other view.”9 4. 1900 Democratic Party Platform, AM. PRESIDENCY PROJECT (July 5, 1900), https://www
control whenever a SWF directs the company to engage in certain “important matters.”9 While the power to “determine, direct or decide” important matters
N.Y.U. L.Q. Rev. 1, 9-16 (1931) (citing United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)). See generally Inazu, supra note 5, at 20-117 (tracing the rise