Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
one of the major purposes 10. Medina v. United States, 92 F. Supp. 2d 545, 553 (E.D. Va. 2000), vacated on other grounds, 259 F.3d 220 (4th Cir
379, 380 (7th Cir. 2003). 2. Id. 3. 42 U.S.C. §§ 12,101-12,213 (2000). 4. 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654. 5. 328 F.3d at 382-83. 6. 29 C.F.R
of Policing, 98 Minn. L. Rev. 2179, 2191-92 (2014); Lvovsky, supra note 2, at 2000-01. See, e.g., Omri Ben-Shahar & Ariel Porat, Personalizing
requiring compliance with 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (2000)). 15. See WIS. STAT. ANN. § 119.23(2)(a)(4) (West 1999). 16. See id. § 118.13(1) (prohibiting
33 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1309 (2000) (arguing that the Court’s anti-commandeering jurisprudence is similarly aimed at expressive harms). Under the statute
neighborhood—was not a typical home. Nearly four years earlier, in October 2000, City Point homeowners voted overwhelmingly to approve an amendment to
“informal” rulemaking, see Mark Seidenfeld, A Table of Requirements for Federal Administrative Rulemaking, 27 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 533 (2000). 28
conditions of coercion. See David France et al., Slav- ery’s New Face, NEWSWEEK, Dec. 18, 2000, at 60, 61. 33. Colleen Owens et al., Understanding the
al., Slav- ery’s New Face, NEWSWEEK, Dec. 18, 2000, at 60, 61. 33. Colleen Owens et al., Understanding the Organization, Operation, and Victimization
offending material. Brown unsuccessfully challenged the decision within the university, and, in June 2000, he filed suit in federal district court