Search results for: "710" (348 results)
Pub. L. No. 100-710, § 105(d), 102 Stat. 4735, 4751 (codified at 46 U.S.C. Front Matter at 10 (2012), applying to subtitle III); Act of Oct. 17
Applied in Judicial Reasoning, 26 YALE L.J. 710, 746 (1917); Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld, Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning
parents are the legal parents). 168. See Doe v. Doe, 710 A.2d 1297 (Conn. 1998) (ruling that, in a custody dispute over a child born through a
Michelle M. Harner, The Corporate Governance and Public Policy Implications of Activist Dis- tressed Debt Investing, 77 FORDHAM L. REV. 703, 710 n
majority of the 109. 280 A.2d 717, 723 (Del. 1971). 110. 162 F.2d 36 (3d Cir. 1947). 111. 457 A.2d 701, 710 (Del. 1983). 112. E.g., Jones v. H.F
Michelle M. Harner, The Corporate Governance and Public Policy Implications of Activist Dis- tressed Debt Investing, 77 FORDHAM L. REV. 703, 710 n.22
The Corporate Governance and Public Policy Implications of Activist Dis- tressed Debt Investing, 77 FORDHAM L. REV. 703, 710 n.22 (2008) (“The practice
655, § 24, 65 Stat. 710, 719-20 (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. § 798). 204. 18 U.S.C. § 798(a). 205. Act of June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §§ 791
334 (1998)); (2) the evidence produced at a bail hearing “was too weak to justify the amount,” id. at 185 (citing United States v. Leisure, 710 F.2d
“unusual” but also “excessive” sentences). 95. State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276, 1280 (La. 1993) (citing State v. Scott, 593 So. 2d 704, 710 (La