Search

Search results for: "2" (3525 results)

The Evolution of Shareholder Voting Rights: Separation of Ownership and Consumption

2012) (unpublish… Hansmann, supra note 8, at 278. However, while the mutual form of organization mitigated potential… 2 Davis, supra note 29, at 245

Microsoft Word - 17. Verstein ME Proof 2_clean.docx

theorized. Consider again the examples from the first 1. Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e–2(a)(1) to (2) (2012). 2. Bd. of Educ., Island

132.8.Ahdout_f44smiqr

O.L.C. at *2 (Jan. 8, 2021). 261. Id. at *25. 262. Id. at *26 (emphasis added). 263. Id. 264. See Immunity of the Dir. of the Off. of Pol

131.8_PonsaKraus_55tr49gr

codified at 48 U.S.C. § 1801 (2018)); N. MAR. I. CONST. art. II, § 2. 249. N. MAR. I. CONST. art. II, § 2(a). 250. Rayphand, 95 F. Supp. 2d at

Microsoft Word - 1888.Fishkin.1910.doc

number of persons in each State.” 60. U.S. CONST. amend. XIV, § 2; see Kalson v. Paterson, 542 F.3d 281, 289 n.16 (2d Cir. 2008) (Calabresi, J

Forum: The Stakes of the Supreme Court’s Pro-Corruption Rulings in the Age of Trump: Why the Supreme Court Should Have Taken Judicial Notice of the Post-January 6 Reality in Percoco

January 6, CNN (Sept. 24, 2021, 2:27 AM EDT), h… See, e.g., Cuebas y Arredondo v. Cuebas y Arredondo, 223 U.S. 376, 382 (1912) (“This court will … Brown v

Unmanned Stakeouts: Pole-Camera Surveillance and Privacy After the i Tuggle /i Cert Denial | Yale Law Journal

Guardian (Feb. 2, 2022, 8:22 AM EST), https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/feb/02/fbi-confirms-it-obtained-nsos-pegasus-spyware https://perma.cc/8XFJ

The Pitfalls and False Promises of Nonlawyer Ownership of Law Firms | Yale Law Journal

Structures in 2021, Ariz. Jud. Branch 5, 13, https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/26/Approved%20ABS%20summaries.pdf https://perma.cc/9MNB-4CKR. × Id. at 2. As

Forum: Escape from the “Devonian Amber”: A Reply to Voting and Vice

2011) (developing a textual argument that Section 2 permits only disqualification for offenses that “relate in a meaningful way to the crime of

Microsoft Word - Manes Macroed for MHT.docx

Stat. 272, 287-88 (codified as amended at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1861-1862 (2012)). 3. 50 U.S.C. § 1861(b)(2)(B). 4. See, e.g., ACLU v. Clapper, 785 F.3d 787