Search results for: "40" (2083 results)
v. Priest, 557 P.2d 929, 939-40 & n.21, 958 (Cal. 1976) (Serrano II) (affirming the trial court’s judgment, which held that any significant wealth
1214 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 8, 15, 18, 22, 28, 40, 42, and 50 U.S.C.). 9. Pub. L. No. 104-208, div. C, 110 Stat. 3009-546
at 3. 40. Id. at 16 (quoting Steven Wisotsky, Beyond the War on Drugs: Overcoming a Failed Public Policy 173 (1990)). 41. Id. 42. N.Y. State Bd. of
Question Headed to High Court, NPR: TWO-WAY (Sept. 20, 2012, 1:40 PM), http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/09/20 /161483885. 14. William J
categories.40 As a matter of doctrine, to say that civil retroactivity is permissible is an accurate description of the ex post facto prohibition standing
special presumption in favor of criminal disenfranchisement laws when applying the VRA’s totality-of-circumstances analysis.40 Finally, the Conclusion
and no less” than that of everyone else (quoting R v. Gray [1900] 2 QB 36 at 40 (Eng.))). 24. See, e.g., Robert Post, Public Accommodations and the
thewastes associatedwith gaming the patent sys- tem to obtain such (indirect) incentives.40 In addition, a focus on the role of ev- ergreening—or trivial
REV. ONLINE 58 (2017) (responding to Ghappour); Zach Lerner, A Warrant To Hack: 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 government hacking 579 An Analysis of the
specificity, by statutes, regulations, and case law.”40 As I will discuss, the APA provides some limited guidance on inputs to the record, but as an omnibus