Search results for: "9" (2500 results)
Section 2 of the Sherman Act: A Clear Path the Supreme Court Did Not Take (Sept. 9, 2017), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3098836 https://perma.cc/F7U2
11. See U.S. CONST. art. I, § 9, cl. 3. 12. See WILLIAM D. POPKIN, A DICTIONARY OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 191-93 (2007). 13. See United
RES. CTR. INST. 9 (Feb. 2013), http://irrcinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/FINAL-Ernst-Report -Feb-20131.pdf [http://perma.cc/G957-YQLS
1. Treaty on Access to Knowledge (May 9, 2005) (draft), http://www.cptech.org/a2k/a2k _treaty_may9.pdf [hereinafter A2K Treaty]. 2. I use the
9 LAW & SOC’Y REV. 95 (1974) (distinguishing repeat players from those who make only oc- casional recourse to a legal system). the yale law journal
Cf. Marc Galanter, Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, 9 LAW & SOC’Y REV. 95 (1974) (distinguishing repeat
; Exec. Order No. 12,612, 52 Fed. Reg. 41685 (Oct. 30, 1987). 98. Exec. Order No. 13,132 §§ 6(a), 9, 3 C.F.R. §§ 206, 209-11 (2000). 99. See Sharkey
370-71 (1892) (Harlan, J., dissenting); Wilkerson v. Utah, 99 U.S. 130, 136-37 (1879); Pervear v. Massachusetts, 72 U.S. (9 Wall.) 475, 480 (1867
continued to understand religion as “a distinctive space of human practice and belief.” ASAD, supra note 71, at 27. 98. Id. at 9 (characterizing
is attributable to the concept, first recognized in Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 738