Search results for: "17" (2417 results)
its understanding is an inevitable outgrowth of precedent, specifically Washington v. Glucksberg.17 That the Dobbs Court staked its claim to
intention in passing the Act was to “insure that all participants in our Federal courts can meaningfully take part.”17 Refusing to cover the translation
Y58H -R879. See supra text accompanying notes 17-19. See supra text accompanying notes 17-19. See, e.g., Pratt & Allen, supra note 7, at 7; Corianne
16 the yale law journal forum 17 18 19 20 triptych's end: a better framework to evaluate 21st century international lawmaking 21 22 23 24 the yale
people.” Id. at 714-17. There are a variety of other theories of judging that we do not consider here. For example, we ignore accounts of judging that take
With its legitimacy tied to the “alchemy of Keynesian economics,”17 the labor movement was counseled away from the “alchemy of rights.”18 Law was
is the reward transferred? 17 Some mechanisms, such as grants, research at national labs, and tax credits, are provided ex ante for all pro- jects
supra note 173, at 286, 286-87. 207. Martin, supra note 204, at 645. 208. Act of Oct. 17, 1785, ch. X, reprinted in 12 THE STATUTES AT LARGE
managed to displace the “classic rule.”17 12. See, e.g., Douglas Laycock, Equal Citizens of Equal and Territorial States: The Constitutional
Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft, 17 POL. SCI. 3, 4 (1965). the yale law journal 132:1970 2023 1978 i . theory A. Definitions Our first task is to