Search results for: "n" (3959 results)
e.g., Nomi Maya Stolzenberg, Marriage as a Legal Metaphor: Commentary on Rachel Adler, 7 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women’s Stud. 203, 206 n.17 (noting that
at 284 n.20; 2A SCOTT & FRATCHER, supra note 2, § 170.7, at 339. My reading of the cited cases is that none actually rests on the stated ground; all
N.Y.S.2d 349, 360 n.3 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009) (Peters, J., dissenting), aff’d as modified, 930 N.E.2d 217 (N.Y. 2010). 50. Id. the yale law
531 U.S. at 115 (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring)). 68. Litman & Shaw, supra note 13, at 1245; William N. Eskridge, Jr., The New Textualism, 37 UCLA L
Loyalists, Native Americans, Quakers, Catholics, and Blacks does nothing to prove that Range is part of a similar group today.”); id. at 104 n.9 (“We need
]. 65. See Bruen, 142 S. Ct. at 2138 n.9 (noting that “nothing in our analysis should be interpreted to suggest the unconstitutionality of the 43
No. 22-CV-1583, 2023 WL 3937317, at *10 n.5 (S.D.N.Y. May 22, 2023) (noting that the court’s denial of standing “does not necessarily mean Plaintiff
local 34. See Schragger, supra note 6, at 1178 & n.81, 1183, 1223-25. 35. Id. at 1165-66, 1228. 36. ALA. CODE § 31-13-5 (LexisNexis 2016); GA
Cent. Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978). 151. See, e.g., Karkkainen, supra note 135, at 87 n.157 (noting that, of eighteen
which is not an arm of the State.” Alden, 527 U.S. at 755-56; see also Conley v. Vill. of Bedford Park, 215 F.3d 703, 709 n.3 (7th Cir. 2000); Narin v