Search results for: "2" (3539 results)
Political Economy of the New Gilded Age 2 (1st ed. 2008); Martin Gilens, Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America 12 (2012
v. ASCAP, 627 F.3d 64, 74 (2d Cir. 2010). 10. 17 U.S.C. § 102(a)(2). 11. Id. § 102(a)(7). the yale law journal 125 : 1531 20 16 1534 A
Burke the very 2. See Sandra E. Garcia, The Woman Who Created #MeToo Long Before Hashtags, N.Y. TIMES (Oct. 20, 2017), https://www.nytimes.com
hie-blueprint-11162012 .pdf [http://perma.cc/W3E9-E396] [hereinafter Blueprint]. 12. 26 U.S.C. § 36B(b)(2)(A) (2012). 13. 42 U.S.C. § 18031(b)(1
at 214-15. 22. Transcript of Oral Argument at 6, Lewis v. City of Chicago, 560 U.S. 205 (2010) (No. 08- 974). 23. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(h) (2006
that 121 cases from search #1, 26 cases from search #2, and 3 cases from search #3 were highly relevant. I also read all 3 cases that I identified
Federal or State Law 274 b. Disputes Between Merchants 278 2. The National-Policy Era: An Ever-Growing Preference for Arbitration 281 3. The Restrictive
at 2-3. 148. George F. Loewenstein et al., Risk as Feelings, 127 PSYCHOL. BULL. 267 (2001). SIEGELMANFINAL.DOC 3/31/2004 12:42 PM 1272 The Yale
Or. Dec. 10, 2012)) (emphasis added). Env’t Def. Fund v. Fed. Energy Regul. Comm’n, 2 F.4th 953, 976 (D.C. Cir. 2021) (quoting Standing Rock Sioux