Search results for: "n" (3960 results)
”). Shajnfeld, supra note 6, at 782-83; Ferro, supra note 23, at 5 n.11 (“In most states attorney’s fees as suit money are now authorized by statute
172. Nadler, Scattershot Policing, supra note 3, at 98. 173. See, e.g., Nadler, No Need to Shout, supra note 3, at 220 n.244. 174. See, e.g
U.S.C.C.A.N. 2553, 2560 n.27 (citing New Era Pub’ns Int’l, APS v. Henry Holt & Co., 884 F.2d 659, 662 (2d Cir. 1989) (Newman, J., dissental)). i say
the nonbreaching party’s right to end the contract. See FARNSWORTH, supra note 41, § 8.15 n.2. 46. According to California Senator Murray, a former
commandeering. See id. at 914 n.7, 930. Nevertheless, the constitutional prohibition has grown up around unfunded mandates, and one suspects that the
1676 j o s h u a h o c hm a n The Second Amendment on Board: Public and Private Historical Traditions of Firearm Regulation abstract. In New York
national security context would necessarily require cabining the reported case law as well. See Pozen, supra note 11, at 534 & n.114 (explaining that
supra note 34, at 752 (“[N]ewly declared constitutional criminal procedure rights are not newly conceived or newly relevant. Rather, they reflect
60. Schwartz, supra note 34, at 752 (“[N]ewly declared constitutional criminal procedure rights are not newly conceived or newly relevant. Rather
; United States v. Diggs, 613 F.2d 988, 998 (D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 (1980); see also O’Con- nor, supra note 24, 853 n.22 (1988