Search results for: "n" (3655 results)
as nonfinal prior to enforcement. On this view, interpretative rules never determine rights or obligations, or produce legal consequences until they
law in neoliberalism and on the interrelations among class, race, and gender. As noted above, this Book Review focuses on The Next Shift’s implications
from Susan Carle, Angela J. Davis, James Forman, Jr., and Kenneth Nunn. I presented a draft of this Review at the UCLA Critical Race Theory Workshop
through the lens of the presidential debates. It is not a pretty picture. From a high point in the nineteenth century (for example, the lengthy Lincoln
Sherman Act. author. Assistant Professor, University of Kentucky College of Law. Tien Quoc Du Nguyen, F.M. Scherer, Sandeep Vaheesan, numerous
ordinary meaning of the language of the law. And they often end there—out of respect for the notice function of the law or deference to the presumed
Congress only considers the costs of increased funding and not the resulting benefits. This Note argues that Congress should repeal these two guidelines and
flux, and it is not clear that resistance to the new class blindness will endure. What is clear is that the emergent notion that class-based
Note reveals flaws in the fundamental assumptions of both camps: that no information can be conveyed neutrally (behavioral law and economics) and that
historical examination of these nonlegislative powers and notes that in some cases, Congress has ceased exercising them as robustly as it once did