Search results for: "n" (3960 results)
Penalty in Kentucky Murder Trials, 1976- 1991: A Study of Racial Bias as a Factor in Capital Sentencing, 20 Am. J. Crim. Just. 17, 17 n.* (1995) (noting
of firearms). 71. United States v. Oppedisano, No. 09-CR-0305, 2010 WL 4961663, at *2 n.2 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2010). 72. Id. 73. Id. at *2. 74. Id
n.5 (2013). 13. See infra Part IV. For more of an overview of the Court’s choice-of-forum doctrine, see David Marcus, The Perils of Contract Procedure
Security, 19 N. ILL. U. L. REV. 657, 664 (1999). 26. Anderson & Franzese, supra note 23. 27. One notable exception is Anika Singh Lemar who discusses
; Nathan Jacobsen, Sand or Concrete at the Beach? Private Prop- erty Rights on Eroding Oceanfront Land, 31 ENVIRONS 217, 244 n.198 (2008) (describing
”); Baradaran, supra note 20, at 745 n.131, 752 (documenting state court decisions allowing consideration of dangerousness and noting that “[o]ver time, states
Gideon”); Meeks v. McKune, 354 F. App’x. 348, 352 n.4 (10th Cir. 2009). gideon’s shadow 2491 overruling Gideon does not make Crawford
Nielson to its facts in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, 133 S. Ct. 2064, 2069 (2013). 77. Stolt-Nielsen, 559 U.S. at 687 n.10 (“We have no
supra note 3, at 903 & n.116; see also ALA. CODE § 13A-1-6 cmt. (noting that “[t]he original draft expressly abolished the common law rule that penal
on Reich’s theory in Goldberg). 115. Goldberg, 397 U.S. at 262 n.8 (citing Reich, Individual Rights, supra note 102, at 1255; Reich, The New