Yale Law Journal

Microsoft Word - Donohue

States v. Blue, No. 1-14-CR-244-SCJ, 2015 WL 1519159, at *2 (N.D. Ga. April 1, 2015). 204. United States v. Ickes, 393 F.3d 501, 505-06 (4th Cir. 2005

134.3.Johnson_1nwx3eqq

§ 2000d (2018). 22. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b) (2018). 23. Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 590 U.S. 644, 683 (2020). 24. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (2018). 25. Id. 26. Id

132.6.Li_seec447d

Petitioners at 1, N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022) (No. 20-843). 207. Id. at 2. 208. Id. at 1 n.1; see also Sarah

Forum: In Defense of a Reasoned Dialogue About Law Firms and Their Sophisticated Clients

Brigham Young University v. Pfizer, Inc., No. 2:06-CV-890, 2010 WL 3855347 (D. Utah Sept. 29, 2010), available at http://scholar.google.com/scholar case

Forum: How Justice Thomas Determines the Original Meaning of Article II of the Constitution

June 5); id. at 175 (June 9); id. at 224, 236 (June 13); id. at 244 (June 15); id. at 292, 300 (June 18); 2 Farrand’s Records 29 (July 17); id. at 41

The Constitutional Right of Self-Government

and Rights (Sept. 1774), in 2 Papers of John Adams 152,… See 1 Journals of the Continental Congress 1774-1789, supra note 21, at 63, 66-70 (declaration

Reasoned Explanation and Political Accountability in the Roberts Court

”). See, e.g., Kagan, supra note 2, at 2372-76; Gillian E. Metzger, Foreword: Embracing Administrative Common Law, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1293, 1333-34 (2012

Microsoft Word - 1557.Claussen.1567.doc

art. XXI. 31. BIT, supra note 6. 32. GATT, supra note 21. 33. BIT, supra note 6, pmbl. recital 2. OP 5/27/2009 6:05:55 PM the casualty of

Microsoft Word - 917.doc

court of a Contracting State.7 1. See, e.g., Peter Trooboff, Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, NAT’L L.J., July 27, 2009. 2. See Convention

Microsoft Word - 943.doc

3. See infra notes 23-24, 28-30 and accompanying text. the yale law journal 120:9 55 2 011 956 If judges are going to be more critical of

Search