Search results for: "350" (592 results)
penalty within a statutorily prescribed range); Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Tucker, 230 U.S. 340, 350-51 (1913) (holding to be excessive the amount of a
350 U.S. 422, 428 (1956), it is evident that a suspect is “compelled . . . to be a witness against himself” at least whenever he must face the modern
specifically excludes the legal effect of any prior representation or promises.107 103. 350 F.2d 445 (D.C. Cir. 1965). Walker-Thomas is also discussed infra
Elliott, 342 U.S. 350 (1952) (No. 273), 1951 WL 82065, at *3 (“The uncontradicted testimony of appellants’ expert witnesses show that compulsory
Affirm at 3, Briggs v. Elliott, 342 U.S. 350 (1952) (No. 273), 1951 WL 82065, at *3 (“The uncontradicted testimony of appellants’ expert witnesses
Gaines. 205. Id. at 350-51. Perhaps, given social, political, demographic, and economic changes in the ensuing years, the school cases would have come
supra note 208, at 350. 231. See Yeazell, supra note 19, at 642. 232. See 2 KEHOE, supra note 205, at 1134, 1202; Yeazell, supra note 19, at 642
decade following the passage of the Judiciary Act, the federal courts adju- dicated nearly 350 equity suits where the only basis for federal
at 199 (Hunstein, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted). 123. Stover v. State, 350 S.E.2d 577 (Ga. 1986) (denying a privacy challenge by
procedural requirements . . . .”); Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council, 490 U.S. 332, 350 (1989) (“t is now well settled that NEPA itself does