Search results for: "At" (3403 results)
differently in the pages that follow. 4. 3 ACKERMAN, supra note 1, at 133. 5. Brown, 347 U.S. at 495. 6. JAMES T. PATTERSON, BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
against fund advisers for breaches of this duty, a fact that took center stage at the Supreme Court this past Term in Jones v. Harris Associates.5
by the statute. In Hively, neither Judge Posner nor Judge Sykes applied Supreme Court Title VII precedents with notable enthusiasm, an attitude at
Lessig & Sunstein, supra note 25, at 38-84. MASHAW 4/10/2006 3:29:58 PM recovering american administrative law 1277 attended to in the
controversies today do not arise from the practice of hunting, and they are not directed at traditional hunting weapons.25 Rather, attempts at prohibition
legislatures could also redraw school-district boundary lines and attendance zones to decrease racial segregation. At the federal level, Congress could
that the Ohio program incentivized attendance at a religious school, the Court found the program constitutional under the notion that the state was only
take on exaggerated salience. Many elements of the simulacrum have at least the ring of truth. But though the cartoon version of section 5 resembles
by forty-five percent over eight years176 despite attacks from 169. Pub. L. No. 101-606, 104 Stat. 3096 (1990) (codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 2921-2691(2012
Wright, and to participants in the Lay Understanding of Justice Concepts Session at Law and Society 2024, the Torts and Civil Procedure Session at the 2024