Search results for: "n" (4016 results)
did not advance knowledge or learning would violate the Preamble. As Heald and Sherry express it, “[A]n author or inventor may not be given
invalidating a provision of the Nationality Act that provided for the involuntary expatriation of U.S. nationals convicted of desertion). Id. at 267 n
BLACKWELL, supra note 613, at 37-41; see also id. at 217 (“[I]n some of the states, the power to sell land for the non-payment of taxes, does not arise
note 38, at 974 n.17; see also infra Section II.B. 42. See supra notes 24-29 and accompanying text. 43. See, e.g., Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S
at 58. The OAG’s report suggests NYPD officers may have underreported the number of stops conducted for violations. Id. at 58 n.43 (“In April of 1999
LAWS OF THE STATE OF NORTH- CAROLINA, PASSED AT NEWBERN, DECEMBER 1785, at 12-13 (Newbern, N.C., Arnett & Hodge 1786)). 170. Id. at 452 & n.150
public no less than a private face.” Tribe, , at 1950-51. William N. Eskridge, Jr., Three Cultural Anxieties Undermining the Case for Same-Sex Marriage
from denial of certiorari). 356. Id. at 1016 n.11. 357. Id. 358. HALLEY, supra note 325, at 1 (noting the perception that the new policy is more
himself.” Reva B. Siegel, She the People: The Nineteenth Amendment, Sex Equality, Federalism, and the Family, 115 Harv. L. Rev. 947, 981 n.96 (2002); see
62 (No. 10-521-cr(L)). 18. Id. at 99. 19. See Vilar, 729 F.3d at 74. 20. See WILLIAM N. ESKRIDGE, JR., DYNAMIC STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 277