Search results for: "The" (4774 results)
stricter and more objective charging guidelines within the executive. These aren’t new ideas. Indeed, they are old, independently good ideas. Their merits
a result even the poor now have to give up a larger proportion of their income than they would have consented to do.101 These historical reflections
they consider “accident-law-plus.” 70 For their part, the efficiency theorists charge that even if recourse theory is a plausible explanation for
if jurors are unable to set them aside.35 A second literature examines this capacity. If jurors can clear their minds, then the biasing influences
grocery store or mall; attending their places of worship; and sitting down next to them at the public library to make a record of everything they read
written around them, rather than demanding that they demonstrate their entitlement to the exception in order to receive it. The majority rejects both
the significance of these two contributions and their theoretical implications. While the Review by and large concurs with Richman and Reynolds’s
fact that the people and their representatives disapprove of inversions implies that there is democratic legitimacy to condemning them. In sum, the
i. existing explanations and their limits 570 A. The Minority-Expropriation View 571 B. The Optimal-Reward View 573 ii. a theory of corporate
but they too will be swept up in the enforcement and will need to extricate themselves, losing their liberty in the meantime. From an