Search results for: "9" (2500 results)
principle[] of international customary law”9—which obliges belligerents to distinguish between combatants and civilians. Article 51(3) of Protocol I
facilities in Virginia.8 VVL was the third-largest player; it operated in Virginia and South Carolina but was exhausting its Virginia reserves.9 To keep VVL
review. Two were Clean Water Act cases (Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.9 and Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council10) in
disgust with congressional corruption extends well beyond those comparatively few districts represented by corrupt members,9 which PRIVILEGE AND
analysis. Part II explores the road not taken in Goodridge—the fundamental rights approach of cases such as Loving v. Virginia,8 Zablocki v. Redhail,9
the ordinance’s constitutionality.9 A month after the ruling, the ordinance was repealed.10 In January 2001, Judge Bucklo made the injunction
discrimination.9 Disagreeing with this contention, Judge Marcus affirmed all of the lower court’s findings of law. The court conceded that “ existent case law
of motives, as Verstein does, seems justified. The Rosetta Stone’s founda- tion seems solid.”9 Although Katz does not pursue the point, I recognize
England at the inception of the Industrial Revolution,9 and ultimately aimed to reorient the ethical sensibilities of their readers to bring them into
does not commence, upon the occurrence of subsequent nondiscriminatory acts that entail adverse effects resulting from the past discrimination.”9