Search results for: "IF" (3032 results)
“What I view as driving my jurisprudence is process. I can’t control the outcomes of cases. . . . And I can live with that if I perceive the process to
their objections to any states’ submissions.26 Finally, it created a “safe-harbor” period: If a state appointed a slate of electors at least six days be
if they dismissed such claims as categorically beyond the proper domain of the courts and the common law. They would duck and weave when they should
whether these informal protections remain robust. And if they do not, formalized protections may be not only appropriate, but necessary. the de facto
may bind others to an outcome, even if those others never directly participate. But courts also group together civil claims in far more informal ways
if they are genuinely novel. 15 While scholars have debated the theoretical underpinnings of this reading, the most discussed rationale for the
ultimately quixotic. Moreover, even if their framework were somehow adopted in principle, it would disappoint in practice because, by design, it relies
asked for a 15% rate.26 So, even if Democrats had been involved in the legislative process, the 21% rate that we ended up with would be in the realm
how federal courts can play a limited but important role in promoting consistency and transparency, if not uniformity