Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
George L. Priest, The Limits of Antitrust and the Chicago School Tradition, 6 J. Competition L. & Econ. 1, 2 (2010), which notes: Looking back on those
law. Figure 2. Look then at the next image—a 2010 picture of the current Supreme Court with its nine Justices, including our honoree, the inaugural
note 2, at 2197. the yale law journal forum February 15, 2016 268 methodology, which they see as flawed or inconsistently applied.6 The second
& FEREJOHN, supra note 2, at 216-20, 228-33. the yale law journal 121:534 2011 562 As another example, consider Ackerman’s theory of
2205 2. Outreach, Intake, and Client Choice 2206 3. System Accessibility and Accuracy 2207 conclusion 2208 appendix: “power calculations” 2210
hepatitis and (2) face incentives to conceal their illness. Id. at 1702-05. BENKLER_POST_FLIP2_INTRO_ADDED.DOC 3/15/2005 7:42:29 PM 2004] Sharing Nicely
269 2. Efficiency Costs of Low-Salience Taxation 270 ii. fine-tuning tax salience 272 A. Identifying the Efficient Degree of Tax Salience 272 B
Understanding Words That Wound 2 (2004). × Cf. Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian 1 (2001) (“The noble title of ‘dissident’ must be earned
2009) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(k)(1)(A)(ii), (C) (2012)); see also Jones, 845 F.3d 28 (“Application of this prong in this case turns on the answers to
History, 43 AD- MIN. L. REV. 197, 206 (1991). 15. 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2012); see also id. § 706(2)(A), (C) (authorizing the reviewing court to “set aside