Search results for: "2" (3555 results)
quo bias of the legislative process in the equal protection context). 71. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (2000). 72. 443 U.S. 193, 204 (1979). 73
interpretation of Tribal law.”); Id. § 1-6-2, http://www.choctaw.org/government/tribal code/Title%201-%20General%20Provisions.pdf http://perma.cc /B9Z2-MZ2F (“Any
23. See I.R.C. § 856(d)(2)(C) (1996). 24. SeeTax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-514, § 663, 100 Stat. 2085, 2302 (providing REITs with some
& HUMPHREYS’S PA. MERCURY, July 14, 1775, at 2, 4. 207. Id. at 2. 208. See RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS §§ 217, 222A (AM. LAW INST. 1965); SIMON DOUGLAS
Floor: Will the Grafts Take?, 100 TAX NOTES 217, 225 (2003). 209. See, e.g., Individual Development Account Act, COLO. REV. STAT. §§ 26-2-1001 to -1005
264 (2011); MICH. COMP. LAWS ANN. §§ 74.20, 113.19 (West 2006); MISS. CODE ANN. § 21-1-57 (2007); MONT. CODE ANN. § 7-2-4918 (2009); NEV. REV. STAT
regulates or prohibits conduct because it is undertaken for religious reasons.”). 75. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-1(a), 2000e-2(a) (2018); C.R. Div., Religious
2) (U.S. SENT’G COMM’N 2021). 121. LA. STAT. ANN. § 15:529.1(G) (2022). 122. Id. § 15:571.3(C)(1). 123. Id. § 15:529.1(A)(1). If both the current
Internet to Instigate a Right-Wing Extremist Crisis, Vox (Feb. 2, 2021, 2:10 PM EST), https://www.vox.com/recode/22256387/facebook-telegram-qanon-proud
Revision Counsel, Office of the Law Revision Coun- sel (June 26, 2017) (on file with author). 54. 2 U.S.C. § 285b(1) (2012). 55. Id. the yale law