Search results for: "n" (4015 results)
the first place); id. at 947 n.48 (acknowledging that the Indiana voter ID study excludes those who appear at a polling place but are not offered a
186 n.1 (1994) (Souter, J., concurring). 19. See, e.g., N.L.R.B. v. Noel Canning, 134 S. Ct. 2550, 2570 (2014); Nixon v. Adm’r of Gen. Servs., 433
NORMA RAE (Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. 1979); see Sachs, supra note 330, at 375 n.134. the yale law journal 130:546 2021 620 employer or
the defendant would not vote its shares during the period of stage divestiture); see also O’Brien & Salop, supra note 3, at 565 n.22 (listing consent
at 28 n.1. 283. S. DOC. NO. 77-10, pt. 1, at 12 (1941); Weiss, supra note 270, at 28. Employers and employees were not involved in the selection
friends”), with William N. Eskridge, Jr., The New Textualism and Normative Canons, 113 Colum. L. Rev. 531 (2013) (reviewing the Scalia and Garner book
Rules for Health Care Partnerships, ProPublica (N… Molly Gamble, 25 Largest Non-Profit Hospital Systems, Becker’s Hosp. Rev., July 24, 2012, http://w
ExxonMobil Corp., 663 F. Supp. 2d 863, 877 n.4 (N.D. Cal.), appeal docketed, No. 09-17490 (9th Cir. Nov. 5, 2009). 126. In Strauss v. Belle Realty
1036-38 (2015). See Tatham, supra note 7, at 27 & n.167. But see Otter v. Salazar, No. 11-CV-00358, 2012 WL 12517198, at 3 (D. Idaho Dec. 4, 2012
Voting Rights in the Antebellum North 55 (2008) (“[I]n 1855, only 100 of the 11,840 black inhabitants [of New York City] cast a vote.”). the yale law