Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
Constitutional Adjudication: The Eleventh Amendment and State Sovereign Immunity, 75 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 953, 1010 (2000) (arguing that “sovereign
2000). 53. Thomas E. Nelson et al., Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects, 19 POL. BEHAV. 221 (1997). 54. Dennis Chong & James N. Druckman, Framing
Court, 148 U. PA. L. REV. 743, 749 (2000), which notes that “the incidence of amicus curiae participation in the Supreme Court has increased
parking spot gets it.”). 81. JEROLD KAYDEN, PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLIC SPACE: THE NEW YORK CITY EXPERIENCE 57 (2000). 82. See, e.g., ATLANTA MUN. CODE
Supp. 2d 1121 (D. Minn. 2000). One of the plaintiffs, Aaron Westendorp, a middle-school student at the time, is now a comic, public advocate, writer
Behavior in Constitutional Challenges Before the Rehnquist Court, 1986-2000, 3 J. EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUD. 237, 237 (2006). 49. For instance, a 1999 meta
1375 (2000)). 131. Burke, supra note 20, at 1219. 132. Id. at 1223. 133. See supra notes 6-7 and accompanying text. 134. See MARKEL, COLLINS
FOUNDATIONS (1993); 2 BRUCE ACKERMAN, WE THE PEOPLE: TRANSFORMATIONS (2000). 2. The Article V process requires that amendments be ratified by the
four following the 2000 census, the initiative process outlined in the state constitution had been effectively nullified. Butler v. Watson, 330 So. 3d