Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
regulatory 112. Cal. Dental Ass’n v. FTC, 224 F.3d 942, 957 (9th Cir. 2000). 113. Id. at 958 (concluding that no “net anticompetitive effect” arises from
M’Intosh and the Expropriation of American Indian Lands, 148 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1065, 1068-1103 (2000). 90. Felix S. Cohen, Original Indian Title, 32 Minn. L
scrutiny. 42 U.S.C. § 2000(b)(b) (2018). The federal RFRA only applies to federal laws, but many states also have their own RFRAs. See generally Jonathan
supra note 15, at 239 n.126. 55. 531 U.S. 98 (2000). 56. For Frankfurter’s view, see Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549, 556 (1946) (plurality opinion
structure. See, e.g., United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 575-77 (2000) (Kennedy, J., concurring); Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 748-52 (1999
Subordination, Stigma, and “Disability,” 86 VA. L. REV. 397 (2000) (arguing that “an understanding of disability as subordination . . . should frame
early-release requirements had to satisfy the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment); Cook v. Wiley, 208 F.3d 1314, 1323 (11th Cir. 2000
& Kenneth L. Karst eds., 2d ed. 2000). 174. See, e.g., St. Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S. 727, 733 (1968); Dodds v. Am. Broad. Co., 145 F.3d 1053, 1062 (9th
The Death of Privacy?, 52 STAN. L. REV. 1461 (2000). privacy's trust gap 1189 gies that can be effective even if they are flawed or only modestly
burdens Free Exercise to pass strict scrutiny. 42 U.S.C. § 2000(b)(b) (2018). The federal RFRA only applies to federal laws, but many states also have their