Search results for: "710" (301 results)
710 (2017). 52. See, e.g., WU, supra note 51 (advocating for antitrust as a mechanism for addressing economic inequality); Harry First & Spencer
J. LEGIS. & PUB. POL’Y 685, 710-18 (2016) (de- scribing the lack-of-data problem for small geographic areas). For more on the shortcomings on the FHA
Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, 26 YALE L.J. 710 (1917). 31. Id. at 718. 32. Id. at 718-33. MERRILLFINAL.DOC OCTOBER 16
Prince, 714 F.3d 694, 710-12 (2d Cir. 2013). 91. Id. 92. Id. at 707-08; Cariou v. Prince, 784 F. Supp. 2d 337, 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2011), rev’d in part
Khan, Note, Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox, 126 YALE L.J. 710 (2017). 52. See, e.g., WU, supra note 51 (advocating for antitrust as a mechanism for
or no social value). 143. Kobayashi, supra note 138, at 710. 144. Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2, 25 (1984). 145. See
in Fair Housing Cases After Inclusive Communities, 19 N.Y.U. J. LEGIS. & PUB. POL’Y 685, 710-18 (2016) (de- scribing the lack-of-data problem for
S.E.2d 710 (Ga. 1974). returning to common-law principles of insider trading 1507 for criminal sanctions is a separate question to be analyzed
59. David G. Myers, Discussion-Induced Attitude Polarization, 28 HUM. REL. 699, 710-12 (1975). 60. BROWN, supra note 8, at 224 (discussing a study in
one or more of the branches seek to transgress the separation of powers.”). See Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654, 710-11 (1988) (Scalia, J., dissenting