Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
11th Cir. 2000) (same). 152. Bearden, 461 U.S. at 665. 153. See supra Section III.A.1. 154. See Funk, supra note 136, at 1102 (explaining that, under
& Kenneth L. Karst eds., 2d ed. 2000). 174. See, e.g., St. Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S. 727, 733 (1968); Dodds v. Am. Broad. Co., 145 F.3d 1053, 1062
167, 190 (2000) (citing “the decisive ruling on this point at the Appomattox courthouse in the case of Grant v. Lee”); Nikiforos Mathews, Beyond
Legal Theory, 9 S. CAL. INTERDISC. L.J. 401, 427 (2000); Syed, supra note 5, at 23 (arguing that pervasive mistakes of both legal for- malism and many
nationwide through the ABA. Younger reports how lawyers dashed the recommendation of the ABA Commission on Multidisciplinary Practice in 2000, the
with Removal in the United States, 2000-2021, NAT’L CTR. ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE & CHILD WELFARE (Mar. 21, 2023), https://ncsacw.acf.hhs.gov/research/child
1181 (2000) (characterizing Justice Brennan’s “apparent admission” that the statute was “unambiguous in Weber’s favor,” as requiring “the judicial
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85 88 ■ Private acts ■ Total
113, 118 (2000))). 65. There is no settled name for this class of documents, and agencies themselves use a variety of names. For rulemakings, the
Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle, 110 Yale L.J. 1, 40-42 (2000); Thomas W. Merrill & Henry E. Smith, The