Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
—Foreword: The Document and the Doctrine, 114 HARV. L. REV. 26 (2000). 67. Elsewhere, I have tried to explore one possible failure of the political process
here has asserted injury to itself.”). 207. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs., Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 180-81 (2000) (citing Lujan v. Defs
“searches and seizures inside a home without a warrant are presumptively 4. See, e.g., United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 40 (2000). 5. U.S. CONST
175. RANDALL ROBINSON, THE DEBT: WHAT AMERICA OWES TO BLACKS 56 (2000). 176. Id. at 17. 177. See, e.g., Alfred L. Brophy, The Tulsa Race Riot
2000) (citing Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992)). the yale law journal 129:1516 2020 1560 might explain how its inability
Ohio Railroad Annual Reports: 1827-1856, Acct. Historians J., June 2000, at 1, 6, 38. 44. John Stover, Routledge Historical Atlas of the American
CORNELL L. REV. 1285 (2008); Anthony V. Alfieri, Prosecuting Violence/Reconstructing Community, 52 STAN. L. REV. 809 (2000); Anthony V. Alfieri
explicitly. 115. See JERRY FODOR, THE MIND DOESN’T WORK THAT WAY: THE SCOPE AND LIMITS OF COMPUTATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 23-40 (2000). the moral
United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000). 89. See, e.g., Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 558 U.S. 310 (2010); Buckley v. Valeo, 424
En- vironmental Regulation, 80 TEX. L. REV. 1997, 2000 (2002) (“The benefits side of a typical cost-benefit analysis is quite controversial, laden