Search results for: "IF" (3925 results)
organization: a crime is “serious” only if its maximum penalty is high enough to impose a “serious deprivation” on the defendant organization. Thus, whether
a crime is “serious” only if its maximum penalty is high enough to impose a “serious deprivation” on the defendant organization. Thus, whether or
and after the legislation, Democrats urged a corporate tax rate of 25% to 28%; meanwhile, Donald Trump asked for a 15% rate. So, even if Democrats had
traditional theories of shareholder governance. But what if some mutual fund investors are stuck and exit is, for them, an empty option? Such is the
problem, largely ignoring the conundrum of indirect ownership and the stress it places on traditional theories of shareholder governance.3 But what if
for disadvantaged populations. If the federal government is to play a renewed role in redistributing economic opportunity, as Schleicher proposes, then
acknowledged that legally cognizable injuries might arise if political rules degrade the quality of policy responsiveness. But, likely assuming that the
uses should be permitted if they satisfy certain regulatory goals or “performance standards.”3 More recently, the self- styled “new urbanists” have
reliable and more legitimate in solving problems and accommodating groups than deliberation by unelected judges.1 Under what circumstances, if any, can
outcome of ongoing litigation, if the prosecutor’s need to defend against disciplinary proceedings, or simple resentment at being reported to the