Search results for: "n" (4044 results)
classes so as not to distort the data.”). 233. Jackson, supra note 41, at 147 & n.69 (observing that “legal protections at the collective invest- ment trust
”). But see Dodge, supra note 14, at 2076 n.37 (noting that “the Charming Betsy canon . . . is not really a comity doctrine”). 317. See Brief for
Probs. 365, 371 & n.26 (2005). See Cornell W. Clayton, Law, Politics and the New Federalism: State Attorneys General as National Policymakers, 56 Rev
supra note 5, at 247. 69. Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 124 S. Ct. 2739, 2765 n.19 (2004). 70. The nationalists offer a third argument, based in a dormant
16 n.11, Wells Fargo Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. City of Richmond, No. C 13-03663 CRB (N.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2013). Both suits were dis- missed soon after
at 859 & nn.8-9, 860, 861 & nn.11-13, 862, 865-66, 869 n.16, 870 & n.17, 873 & n.22, 874 & n.23, 875 & nn.24-25, 876-77. 9. Id. at 886 (Gilman, J
Laws 147, 147. 50. See Carpenter, supra note 43, at 30, 502 n.7 (2021) (noting that memorials were originally distinct from petitions in that they
… See, e.g., Amos N. Guiora, Suspected Terrorists: Domestic Terror Courts Are Waiting!, 156 U. Pa. L… See Stephen Dycus et al., National Security Law
Bank, N.A. v. Schmidt 546 U.S. 303, 314 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 James R. Gilreath 0 state 668 5.08 Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of N. New Eng. 546 U.S