Search results for: "IF" (3926 results)
and military officers.) And if we cannot change the political realities for Congress, we can still work with where they are willing to apply pressure
disputes pushes Hayekian ideals to their limits, subjecting them to a kind of trial by ordeal. If Hayek’s commitment to the rule of law is defensible
generated original, important, and persuasive accounts of most if not all major landmarks of American constitutional development.1 To be sure
bureaucratic independence by sub-delegating more power to lower-level officials and military officers.5) And if we cannot change the political
not pre- vent the executive branch from acting, if it believes that there are compelling reasons to do so,” wrote one commentator. 6 Yet at Guantánamo
Gonzaga University v. Doe. The Gonzaga Court had held that private litigants could not enforce a federal statute through 42 U.S.C. §1983 if Congress did
filed with the court. In the brief, we argued that home-schooled children should not be declared truant if, in the opinion of local public school
“necessary and proper” to the execution of such a power.6 In the decades after the New Deal, however, it seemed as if almost nothing was beyond the purview
journal 121:1970 2012 1980 subject to the FCPA either as a consequence of their status as U.S. issuers or if an “act in furtherance of . . . [a
factors, when based on medical evidence and not inaccurate stereotypes, are legal to consider even if they disadvantage some patients with specific