Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
enforcing securities and corporate law in the United States. A shi� to arbi- 2. United States Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16; 9 U.S.C. §§ 201-208; 9
In response 1. 138 S. Ct. 2361 (2018). 2. See Aziza Ahmed, Informed Decision Making and Abortion: Crisis Pregnancy Centers, Informed Consent, and
opportunity,”5 and 1. 558 U.S. 310 (2010). 2. Am. Tradition P’ship, Inc. v. Bullock, 132 S. Ct. 2490 (2012) (per curiam). 3. For instance, the Court
In response 1. 138 S. Ct. 2361 (2018). 2. See Aziza Ahmed, Informed Decision Making and Abortion: Crisis Pregnancy Centers, Informed Consent
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2(a) (2012). Ocasio, 136 S. Ct. at 1432 n.6. But the decision went on to note that the Government’s brief had cited cases
id.; 750 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 46 / 204 (West 2016); N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 168-B:2(V) (2014). See supra text accompanying note 245. See supra text
19 he sees property as serving both as a foundation for exchange and as a vindication of the owner’s legitimate expectations.20 14. 2 BLACKSTONE, supra
Transfer of Prison Inmates in the United States, U.S. Dep’t Justice 2 (Feb. 2006), http://static.nicic.gov/Library/021242.pdf http://perma.cc/43C5-5FUS
capital are more optimally suited for household ownership than suppliers of labor: they tend to (1) be few in number and stable in identity; (2) bear