Results for '262'
Rethinking Rights After the Second Reconstruction
Ct. 2541 (No. 10-277). Id. at 262-65 (first and second emphases added). See generally Mark Kelman, Market Discrimination and Groups, 53 Stan. L. Rev
Forum: Shocking Business Bankruptcy Law
Motions to Dismiss, In re Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am., 628 B.R. 262 (Bankr. N.D. T… 11 U.S.C. § 1126 (2018) (describing voting requirements); id. § 1129
Forum: A Rosetta Stone for Causation
274 (1977). Additionally, courts routinely use quantitative-like language to describe causal concepts. See, e.g., Price Waterhouse, 490 U.S. at 262
Prisons as Laboratories of Antidemocracy
America’s 18th- and 19th-century slaveholders.”). See New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, 311 (1932) (Brandeis, J., dissenting) (“It is one of the
Forum: The Unconvincing Case for Resale Royalties
seriously doubt that resale royalty rights will reduce the buyers’ willingness to pay. See, e.g., Hansmann & Santilli, supra note 19, at 262; Rub
Forum: No Entrenchment: Thomas on the Hobbs Act, the Ocasio Mess, and the Vagueness Doctrine
Racketeering Act.” Evans, 504 U.S. at 262. Justice Stevens later remarked that the legislative history of the Hobbs Act was “sparse and unilluminating with
The Weaponization of Attorney’s Fees in an Age of Constitutional Warfare
Matthew A. Shapiro, Distributing Civil Justice, 109 Geo. L.J. 1473, 1482 (2021) (descri… New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, 311 (1932) (Brandeis
Forum: On Estimating Disparity and Inferring Causation: Sur-Reply to the U.S. Sentencing Commission Staff
advance while the exact timing of the Court’s decision was not known … Schmitt et al., , at 262; Starr & Rehavi, , at 33. Note that assessment of
Forum: Ordering Conduct Yet Evading Review: A Simple Step Toward Preserving Federal Supremacy
U.S. 383, 392-93 (1988); Babbitt v. United Farm Workers… See id. (citing Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447, 488 (1923) (“If a case for preventive
Forum: The Agency Costs of Equal Treatment Clauses
buyer to the potential for appraisal arbitrage. Delaware General Corporate Law § 262 allows shareholders, after a merger, to petition the court to