Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
striking down portions of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb (2000), as an invalid exercise of Congress’s power
adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (2000). 33
See, e.g., JOAN C. WILLIAMS, UNBENDING GENDER: WHY FAMILY AND WORK CONFLICT AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT 70 (2000) [hereinafter WILLIAMS, UNBENDING]; Joan
2000 The Yale Law Journal [Vol. 113: 1999 including provisions of the NLRA itself. Part III suggests an alternative analysis of the California law
D.D.C. 2000). In an era of economic globalization, U.S. judges must increasingly consider the international consequences of their decisions, even
D.D.C. 2000). On direct appeal, the Supreme Court issued an affirmance without opinion, implying that the three-judge court was properly convened
Brian Groom & Peter Norman, EU Leaders Draw Up Outline Deal on Treaty Revisions, FIN. TIMES, Dec. 11, 2000, at 1. On other issues, Council decisions
298, 301-07 (2000); see also Lisa M. Diamond, Sexual Identity, Attractions, and Behavior Among Young Sexual-Minority Women Over a 2-Year Period, 36
presidential power”). 15. 18 U.S.C. § 2340A (2000). 16. See, e.g., Shane, supra note 1 (discussing the argument that the President has inherent
Forward Leaning Legislation or Just Bad Law?, 5 UCLA J. INT’L L. & FOREIGN AFF. 199, 221 (2000) (“As it is written, the terrorism exception diminishes