Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
22 (2009); and Victoria Nourse, Misreading Law, Misreading Democracy 64-68 (2016). See Grove, supra note 1, at 266-67; William N. Eskridge, Jr
argument has not, however, been uniform. See, e.g., Government’s Reply Brief at 22 n.12, United States v. Horton, No. 16-3976, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
prosecution); 6 Richard A. Greenberg et al., New York Practice Series: New York Criminal Law § 36:8, n.11 (3d ed. 2014) (discussing People v. Marquez, N.Y
reprinted in 1992 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2553, 2560 n.27 (analyzing the need to amend the Copyright Act to overturn two Second Circuit decisions (citing New Era
it. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction at 15-16 n.11, Wells Fargo Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. City of Richmond, No. C 13-03663 CRB (N.D. Cal. Sept
292 (2009) (claiming that twenty-one states require oaths of support to the Constitution). Id. at 48-49 & n.293 (noting that Supreme Court requires an
effects); Minow, supra note 77, at 283-87 & n.101 (noting the complicated and sometimes hostile relationship between the women’s right and children’s
; Minow, supra note 77, at 283-87 & n.101 (noting the complicated and sometimes hostile relationship between the women’s right and children’s rights
protect children from substance effects); Minow, supra note 77, at 283-87 & n.101 (noting the complicated and sometimes hostile relationship between the
during pregnancy, against child-rights advocates who seek to protect children from substance effects); Minow, supra note 77, at 283-87 & n.101 (noting